Greetings!
We recently adopted this letterbox:
http://www.letterboxing.org/BoxView.php?boxnum=13281&boxname=Lil_Redneck_Riding_Hood
and restored the original mystery clues.
We're wondering if anyone knows the plant date. We've tried the wayback machine but can't find pre-changeover clues that include a date. We're also interested in seeing a pre-2006 image of the stamp if anyone is willing to share. We're not sure if the stamp that is now in the box is original.
Thanks,
EllBee
Lil Redneck Riding Hood
3 messages in this thread |
Started on 2010-12-22
Lil Redneck Riding Hood
From: ellbee01 (leronis@verizon.net) |
Date: 2010-12-22 19:20:24 UTC
Re: [LbNA] Lil Redneck Riding Hood
From: (LundyandVickster@aol.com) |
Date: 2010-12-22 16:12:09 UTC-05:00
Ellbee,
It looks like it was announced on May 5, 2003 on the LB Announce list:
_http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878_
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878)
The "What's New" page on the archived version on LBNA dated Mar 29, 2003
shows a plant date of March 12, 2003.
Larry
In a message dated 12/22/2010 2:20:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
leronis@verizon.net writes:
Greetings!
We recently adopted this letterbox:
http://www.letterboxing.org/BoxView.php?boxnum=13281&boxname=Lil_Redneck_Rid
ing_Hood
and restored the original mystery clues.
We're wondering if anyone knows the plant date. We've tried the wayback
machine but can't find pre-changeover clues that include a date. We're also
interested in seeing a pre-2006 image of the stamp if anyone is willing to
share. We're not sure if the stamp that is now in the box is original.
Thanks,
EllBee
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [LbNA] Lil Redneck Riding Hood
From: EllBee (leronis@verizon.net) |
Date: 2010-12-22 16:22:22 UTC-05:00
Thanks! It didn't occur to me to try the 'What's New' link...or the
Announce list.
EllBee
On 12/22/2010 4:12 PM, LundyandVickster@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Ellbee,
>
> It looks like it was announced on May 5, 2003 on the LB Announce list:
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878)
>
> The "What's New" page on the archived version on LBNA dated Mar 29, 2003
> shows a plant date of March 12, 2003.
>
> Larry
>
>
> In a message dated 12/22/2010 2:20:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> leronis@verizon.net writes:
>
> Greetings!
>
> We recently adopted this letterbox:
> http://www.letterboxing.org/BoxView.php?boxnum=13281&boxname=Lil_Redneck_Rid
>
> ing_Hood
> and restored the original mystery clues.
>
> We're wondering if anyone knows the plant date. We've tried the wayback
> machine but can't find pre-changeover clues that include a date. We're
> also
> interested in seeing a pre-2006 image of the stamp if anyone is
> willing to
> share. We're not sure if the stamp that is now in the box is original.
>
> Thanks,
> EllBee
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Announce list.
EllBee
On 12/22/2010 4:12 PM, LundyandVickster@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Ellbee,
>
> It looks like it was announced on May 5, 2003 on the LB Announce list:
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lbox-announce/message/878)
>
> The "What's New" page on the archived version on LBNA dated Mar 29, 2003
> shows a plant date of March 12, 2003.
>
> Larry
>
>
> In a message dated 12/22/2010 2:20:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> leronis@verizon.net
>
> Greetings!
>
> We recently adopted this letterbox:
> http://www.letterboxing.org/BoxView.php?boxnum=13281&boxname=Lil_Redneck_Rid
>
> ing_Hood
> and restored the original mystery clues.
>
> We're wondering if anyone knows the plant date. We've tried the wayback
> machine but can't find pre-changeover clues that include a date. We're
> also
> interested in seeing a pre-2006 image of the stamp if anyone is
> willing to
> share. We're not sure if the stamp that is now in the box is original.
>
> Thanks,
> EllBee
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]